 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| A&P v. Branford Inland Wetlands Comm'n, 445428,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A review of the record evinced substantial evidence demonstrating that the inland wetlands and watercourses commission evaluated the proper criteria in approving the developer's application.
|
|||||
| Booth v. Booth, FA000341057,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut court's award of alimony and child support pendente lite did not look to all issues involved in divorce, but focused on parties' earning capacities and income needs.
|
|||||
| Bozzuto'S, Inc. v. Pilot Supermarket, CV9700138970S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court's judgment found amounts owed to grocery wholesaler who acted as contractor for retail store's remodeling and found amounts owed to store by wholesaler on its counterclaim relating to delays and faulty workmanship, but not lost profits.
|
|||||
| Cusick v. Register, CV990432766S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court denied defendant's summary judgment motion in pedestrian employee's slip and fall action since question of ownership and/or control of parking lot was genuine issue of material fact which could not be resolved until discovery and trial.
|
|||||
| Divito v. Divito, FA000160786S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court gave more weight to the wife's position in awarding her the marital property. It considered, inter alia, the length of the marriage, her monetary and non-monetary contributions, and the husband's fault for the marital breakdown.
|
|||||
| Fletcher v. Fletcher, FA010384421S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parties' interest in Jamaican property was not an enforceable right. It was nothing more than an opportunity to attain property in the future. Court could not order Jamaica to transfer its interests in the land.
|
|||||
| Flynn v. Warden, 558829,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed prisoner's writ of habeas corpus petition since, although prisoner had contracted latent tuberculosis and had acquired limited immunity, facility provided adequate medical services and was not detrimental to his health.
|
|||||
| Gavigan v. Comm'r of Revenue Servs., CV010508067S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where taxpayer, acting pro se, failed to properly serve complaint on attorney general as required by Connecticut statutory procedures for appealing tax determinations, superior court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear his tax appeal.
|
|||||
| Graham v. Graham, FA000339683S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's claim that mother was in contempt for failing to transport children to airport for monthly visit, in violation of court-order, was rejected where airline eliminated flight following terrorist attack, and children had anxiety about flying.
|
|||||
| Joyce Carol Lyman v. Town of Fairfield, CV980354747,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There were genuine material fact issues as to whether governmental immunity shielded town employees who were sued by executrix for, inter alia, negligence related to husband's death at town's fitness center. Thus, summary judgment was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
