LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 22, 2003

  
Allen Constr. v. Cabanilla, CV000376419S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bimler v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., 110028, 109768, 109618, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court upheld jury verdict awarding $ 200,000 to terminated employee for negligent infliction of emotional distress claim after she was acquitted of theft after employer initiated police investigation; claim was not preempted by NLRA.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bourassa v. Bourassa, FA960111207S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Father, whose long-time high-paying computer field position was terminated and who had become poorly-paid real estate salesman, was not entitled to reduction in child and spousal support; he was obligated to seek other viable avenues of employment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dubreuil v. Witt, 539287, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment for $ 32,500 was entered in favor of the president and his wife where the allegations of negligence against the attorney were proven, and his wrongful acts and omissions proximately caused the entry of default judgment against the president.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Francis v. Warden, CV010804771S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A confidential informant's criminal background, participation in the same crime as defendant, and immunity were exculpatory and should have been turned over; counsel would be ineffective for failing to try to obtain the exculpatory material.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Griffin v. Griffin, CV970344839, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a driver defaulted, there was no question that an automobile accident was proximately caused by the negligence and carelessness of the driver; therefore, damages in the form of medical expenses could be awarded.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hensch v. Hensch, FA990552055S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The motion to increase the child support was granted as the father was receiving additional income from rental properties, his demotion appeared to be the result of his own conduct, and he did not seem to be paying rent to his girlfriend as alleged.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Aaron B., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the mother refused to see a neglected minor child while the department of children and families was involved, the child was committed to the department pending further evaluation as to placement with the father.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kavy v. New Britain Bd. of Educ., CVX03990492921S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Failing to investigate was not extreme or outrageous conduct, and was not an intrusion. An allegation that wrongful conduct occurred between parties with the same employer during business hours was insufficient for respondeat superior liability.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lewis v. Chelsea G.C.A. Realty P'Ship, X06CV960154801S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court granted summary judgment to developer sued by debtor whose bankruptcy estate was sued by developer; bankruptcy court had exclusive jurisdiction over estate and collateral matters; Noerr-Pennington could also protect developer.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.