|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 22, 2004
|
| |
Boccanfuso v. Gorham, CV000379584S, CV000379583S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Landowners established adverse possession of parcels where they used them to access the beach for recreational and maintenance activities for a period of at least 28 years under claim of ownership before neighbors acquired title by quitclaim deed.
|
|
| |
Dichele v. Dichele, FA020465526S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Francis T. Zappone Co. v. Plymouth Commons Realty Corp., CV020820681S, CV020816568S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a series of claims arising from the marketing and attempted sale of certain commercial real estate, including breach of contract and unfair business practices, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues.
|
|
| |
Gorham v. Newtown Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV030348096S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Approval of a subdivision did not violate subdivision regulations, as substantial evidence supported zoning commission's finding that a road adjacent to the subdivision was a public road, despite the introduction of contrary evidence.
|
|
| |
Gurn v. Oldaker, CV950374891,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court denied tenant's motion to reargue or to set aside judgment for landlord on landlord's claim and tenant's counterclaim; trial court had certain documents, which tenant claimed it did not have, to consider when making its decision.
|
|
| |
In re Amber F., No Docket Number,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Termination of parental rights was in the child's best interest; the parents failed to maintain contact, were unwilling or unable to benefit from reasonable reunification efforts, and the child's medical condition required special care.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Spatz v. Spatz, FA010452807,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a husband sought articulation of his alimony obligations, the court clarified the alimony order as well as its college tuition order.
|
|
| |
Veccharelli v. Valentina, CV020389531S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2004, Decided , January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In siblings' action for forgery of their father's signature on life insurance beneficiary forms, damages were appropriate for conversion, and there was sufficient evidence of theft for treble damages. They were also entitled to attorney fees.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback