 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dichello v. Marlin Firearms Co., CV065002796S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an employer's inaction in response to complaints of harassment by another employee alone was insufficient to establish extreme and outrageous conduct, a former employee's allegations were legally insufficient to create a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Dichello v. Marlin Firearms Co., CV065002796S, Opinion No.: 96835,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an employee did not comply with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-100 as she did not request a release of jurisdiction from the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities within 15 days of its decision as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-83a(b) and she waited 251 days to commence her discrimination action, the action was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Donenfeld v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., CV030090944S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied employer's motion for summary judgment on claimant's allegation that it engaged in intentional misconduct in directing claimant regarding operation of a particular piece of machinery; genuine issue existed about whether employer intentionally created dangerous condition that made claimant's injury substantially certain to occur.
|
|||||
| Giroux v. Pasqualini Constr., Inc., 5100794,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 22, 2007, Decided , January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hekeler v. Kauffman, CV020470710S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2007, Decided , January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court found for the home seller on the home buyers' complaint for fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation, as the home buyers did not prove that they relied on the alleged misrepresentations of the home seller; additionally, the home seller proved her special defense of waiver as to both claims.
|
|||||
| Heussner v. Heussner, CV064017640S, CV064017876S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2007, Decided , January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motions to dismiss two probate appeals were granted. While a probate court had the authority to amend an error in the original return date, the amended date set by the probate court exceeded the two-month time limit in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-48(b), making it untimely.
|
|||||
| In re Nathaniel P., K09CP04009522, K09CP04009523, K09CP04009524, K09CP04009525,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, JUVENILE MATTERS, AT WATERFORD, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights as to four children was granted, as the parents had intellectual deficits and longstanding and ingrained mental health issues. The children had dramatically improved in foster care. Both parents told an evaluator that they anticipated consenting to the termination of their parental rights.
|
|||||
| Laureano v. Laureano, FA02126383S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 22, 2007, Decided , January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-231(n)(7), the trial court found record contained substantial evidence to support the family court magistrate's arrearage calculation and, thus, that calculation was not clearly erroneous nor arbitrary and capricious; calculation determined father should pay more in child support from time after he was employed.
|
|||||
| Mohler v. Suffield Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV054017763,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
