|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - December 10, 1999
|
| |
|
| |
S&P Oyster Co. v. Town of Stonington, 549484,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A mandamus was issuable only if intervening defendant met three conditions which he did not meet because the town's tree pruning was discretionary and he had no clear legal right to have the legal duty performed.
|
|
| |
Schluensen v. Administrator, CV 990171806,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Unemployment insurance claim denied; sufficient evidence justified the conclusion that plaintiff left his employment voluntarily after an argument with his boss and chose not to return to work, although given the opportunity.
|
|
| |
Town of Enfield v. Ouelette, CV 9148598S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Landowners were ordered to pay town $ 4,100 for being in contempt of judgment stipulating they would conform to zoning regulations prohibiting signs; 18 sign violations were proven, evidence proved violations were willful.
|
|
| |
Whyte v. Warden, CV 972499S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, December 10, 1999, Decided , December 10, 1999, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The habeas petition was dismissed because the failure to call certain witnesses at a hearing to show trial counsel's conflict of interest for multiple representation did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|