 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Buckman v. J.P. Carroll Constr. Co., CV 980576511S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, April 6, 2000, Decided , April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's submission of evidence created disputed issues of fact precluding summary judgment on his claim for intentional injuries under an exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers' Compensation Act.
|
|||||
| Grillo v. Grillo, FA 970715804S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, April 6, 2000, Decided , April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The case involved a dissolution of marriage where the court entered dissolution on the ground of irretrievable breakdown and ordered division of property and other relief based upon the parties' financial condition.
|
|||||
| Lowe v. Durso, CV 99066799,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, April 6, 2000, Decided , April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff who owned condominium jointly with defendant was entitled to one-half equity in house defendant bought solely using a bridge loan from sale of the condominium under the theory of unjust enrichment.
|
|||||
| McMann v. Dignoti, CV 9970121S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, April 6, 2000, Decided , April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff who was injured by individual who left defendants' bar while intoxicated was granted motion to strike defendants' contributory negligence defense because the defense was not allowed under Connecticut law.
|
|||||
| Moazed v. Moazed, FA 990173882S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 6, 2000, Decided , April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Swingle v. Watertown Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 000158097S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Temporary restraining order prohibiting enforcement of cease and desist order was granted as to uses that were either in the future or within zoning laws, but was denied as to prohibited activities.
|
|||||
| Zercie v. Vantage Point Condo. Ass'n, 398828,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, April 6, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant did not show that it owed no duty to plaintiff, plaintiff's injury was foreseeable, and control was not required to find it liable for defect in premises; thus, summary judgment on negligence claim was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
