 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Macher v. Macher, FA000072274,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dissolution of marriage case, court found that each party was able to provide for their support and denied alimony to both parties. Attorneys fees were denied and property was divided.
|
|||||
| Nusbaum & Parrino v. Harrick, CV000179122S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unclean hands doctrine could preclude foreclosure of mortgage given to law firm to secure legal bills if client's ex-wife could prove that firm obtained its interest by unethical conduct.
|
|||||
| O'Halloran v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp., 990079084,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A doctor's CUTPA claim against a hospital and staff members was stricken; there were no allegations from which an inference could be drawn that defendants' acts occurred in the conduct of trade or commerce, which was a necessary element.
|
|||||
| Park Distribs. v. Ust Bank Conn., CV960334576S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trustee's conversion claim against deputy sheriff was stricken; deputy sheriff was not liable for levying a facially valid writ of execution at a bank against a trust that was a judgment debtor, even if the bank debited the wrong account.
|
|||||
| Rubenstein v. Oxford Health Plans, CV000370404S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unless the employee was actuated at least in part by a purpose to serve the employer, the employer was not liable. At the time of the accident the employee had left work for the day. Thus, the employer was not vicariously liable.
|
|||||
| State v. Peterson, MV000312836,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officer, even without probable cause for arrest, was permitted to detain individual if officer believed that he was engaged in criminal activity. Roadside sobriety tests were justified by reasonable suspicion that driver was intoxicated.
|
|||||
| Vazquez v. Warden, 558796,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prisoner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that a correctional institution had denied him appropriate medical care was denied, as the institution was providing appropriate medical care for the prisoner's condition.
|
|||||
| Velasco v. Warden, CV982825,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 18, 2002, Decided , January 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Elements of underlying offense had to be proven to convict inmate of felony murder, but it was not necessary to convict him of separate underlying offense. Inmate's conviction for felony murder, and not underlying offense, was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
