|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 4, 2002
|
| |
Scofield v. Aiu Ins. Co., CV000339294S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Family oriented language in business insurance policy created ambiguity as to whether business employees and family members were covered. Policy was construed against insurer, and child of business employee was entitled to UIM coverage.
|
|
| |
Sobolowski v. Solbolowski, FA940541729,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court had power to modify amount of life insurance ex-husband was obliged to carry to secure alimony obligation, but his paying down much of his alimony obligation was not substantial change in circumstances sufficient to justify modification.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Tobin & Melien v. Bressler, CV000443619S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because husband and wife had probable cause to believe they had valid cause of action against law firm, their small claims action did not constitute vexatious litigation. Law firm failed to prove lost profits.
|
|
| |
Updike v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Updike v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Law firm did not violate unfair trade practices act; rather, clients took unfair advantage of law firm by failing to honor their obligations to pay legal fees after underlying federal lawsuit failed.
|
|
| |
Waters v. Desmarais, CV912645,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, HOUSING SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback