Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Connecticut - March 4, 2002

  
Scofield v. Aiu Ins. Co., CV000339294S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Family oriented language in business insurance policy created ambiguity as to whether business employees and family members were covered. Policy was construed against insurer, and child of business employee was entitled to UIM coverage.

Search Cases for Free

  
Sobolowski v. Solbolowski, FA940541729, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court had power to modify amount of life insurance ex-husband was obliged to carry to secure alimony obligation, but his paying down much of his alimony obligation was not substantial change in circumstances sufficient to justify modification.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Ostreicher, CR95225614, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Connecticut probation department could require convicted sex offender to submit to periodic polygraph examinations as probation condition, and seek to revoke his probation for failure to submit.

Search Cases for Free

  
Stranko v. Stranko, FA930301174, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Wife was bound by agreement with husband that he would not be liable for payment of further alimony after discovering that she was cohabiting with a man, despite husband's failure to seek court modification of obligation.

Search Cases for Free

  
Tobin & Melien v. Bressler, CV000443619S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because husband and wife had probable cause to believe they had valid cause of action against law firm, their small claims action did not constitute vexatious litigation. Law firm failed to prove lost profits.

Search Cases for Free

  
Updike v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Updike v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW BRITAIN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Law firm did not violate unfair trade practices act; rather, clients took unfair advantage of law firm by failing to honor their obligations to pay legal fees after underlying federal lawsuit failed.

Search Cases for Free

  
Waters v. Desmarais, CV912645, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, HOUSING SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, March 4, 2002, Decided , March 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top