|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 22, 2003
|
| |
McCarty v. McCarty, FA010387527,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Advising deponents that they did not need to attend deposition if subpoenaed documents were produced before scheduled date, and failure to, inter alia, notify opponent of receipt of documents, was improper. However, sanctions were not warranted.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Tayco Corp. v. Wallingford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020462222S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The zoning commission's reasons, viewed either individually or collectively, were not sufficient to sustain its decision to deny the property owner's application regarding a sand and gravel operation.
|
|
| |
Walker v. Winston, CV990429373S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A contractor's failure to comply with the Home Improvement Act by excluding a three-day cool-down provision was a per se violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act; however, punitive damages and attorneys fees were not warranted.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback