Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Connecticut - January 22, 2003
	McCarty v. McCarty, FA010387527, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Advising deponents that they did not need to attend deposition if subpoenaed documents were produced before scheduled date, and failure to, inter alia, notify opponent of receipt of documents, was improper. However, sanctions were not warranted. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mitchell, CV020820727, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 22, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Tayco Corp. v. Wallingford Planning & Zoning Comm'n, CV020462222S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: The zoning commission's reasons, viewed either individually or collectively, were not sufficient to sustain its decision to deny the property owner's application regarding a sand and gravel operation. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Walker v. Winston, CV990429373S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2003, Decided , January 22, 2003, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A contractor's failure to comply with the Home Improvement Act by excluding a three-day cool-down provision was a per se violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act; however, punitive damages and attorneys fees were not warranted. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.