 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Martinez, AC 26180,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 25, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was an abuse of discretion to refuse to grant defendant an evidentiary hearing to determine the admissibility of evidence of a victim's prior sexual conduct because the evidence was admissible under an exception to the rape shield statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 54-86f(4). He presented facts showing the falsity of the victim's prior allegations.
|
|||||
| State v. Sitaras, AC 27675,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 25, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of interfering with an officer in violation of Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-167a(a). The jury could have found that defendant's refusals to enter a police vehicle when ordered to do so and to turn around and put his hands behind his back delayed an officer in the performance of his duties in effecting defendant's arrest.
|
|||||
| State v. T.R.D., SC 17865,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 25, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was entitled to a new trial on the charge of failing to register as a sex offender under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿¿ 54-251, 257, as trial court failed to inform him of the range of possible penalties he would face upon conviction. State was not required to take additional steps to contact defendant after he failed to return verifications forms.
|
|||||
| State v. Wade, AC 27397,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 25, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's first-degree manslaughter conviction under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-55(a)(3) was reversed because he did not act recklessly with extreme indifference to life. The evidence was sufficient for a second-degree manslaughter conviction under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-56(a)(1) when defendant disregarded the risk of distributing prescription drugs.
|
|||||
| TES Franchising. LLC v. Feldman, SC 17867,
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, March 25, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence for a trial court to find probable cause to grant a franchisor a prejudgment remedy in its breach of contract action because sufficient evidence supported a finding that a franchisee made disparaging remarks and disclosed confidential information about the franchisor in violation of the parties' settlement agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
