 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brennan v. City of New London, 555273,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City, in appeal from tax assessment decision, could not strike certain portions of plaintiff's complaint, including parts of plaintiff's prayer for relief, where the portions sought to be stricken were not separate causes of action.
|
|||||
| Caggiano v. City of New Haven, 363853,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court entered judgment for a city in plaintiffs' slip and fall on an exterior staircase of the city's building. There was no credible evidence that a debris accumulation was the result of the negligence of the city or its employees.
|
|||||
| Celano v. Deloughery, CV000442715,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of a victim in her action alleging negligence and intentional assault against an assailant and a claim under the parental liability statute against the assailant's mother upon the entry of default.
|
|||||
| Chisholm v. Mutual Mortg. Servs., CV990421560,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Norwich v. Avery, CV970112342,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff remained in possession of property bought at foreclosure sale pending defendant's appeal of the approval of the sale; the sale was confirmed and ratified, and title of the property was transferred to plaintiff and the deed recorded.
|
|||||
| Ford v. Ford, FA830215113S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex-husband was required to continue alimony payments because even if alleged oral agreement to suspend alimony existed, only court could relieve him of obligation, and ex-wife did not waive right by intentionally relinquishing it.
|
|||||
| Freeman v. King, 118911, 118347,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was granted in action brought under accidental failure of suit statute where plaintiffs produced no evidence showing prior noncompliance with court order occurred because of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
|
|||||
| Freeman v. McCarthy, 118347,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted summary judgment to a defendant in a car accident based upon the same reasoning used when it granted summary judgment to other defendants, the two-year statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Freshnex, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Strategies, CV000437778S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 19, 2001, Decided , January 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's first special defense was stricken where it provided no factual basis as to the nature of the defense, and the third count of its counterclaim was stricken where it failed to allege that acts complained of were done in business.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
