|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 21, 2005
|
| |
|
| |
Baran v. Carvell, FA040072543,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Mother's motion to dismiss plaintiff's Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 46b-59 action for visitation with her minor child was denied because plaintiff had a close and substantial parent-like relationship with the child, even though plaintiff was not the child's biological father, and real and significant harm would result should visitation be denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ertel v. Rocque, CV030100647S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Various constitutional claims against two state employees relating to the removal of a dock were dismissed based on sovereign immunity under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 4-165. A takings claim under Conn. Const. art. 1, ? 11 was also dismissed because the employee did not have a property right in a dock he was ordered to remove based on a permit violation.
|
|
| |
Farley v. Farley, FA030733085,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The marriage of approximately 37 years had broken down irretrievably with no hope of reconciliation. The court awarded property based upon the duration of the marriage.
|
|
| |
Ferrer v. Ferrer, FA044004659,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a child was age 19 and had graduated from high school, the father was no longer required to pay child support to the child. The child had been emancipated pursuant to both Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 1-1d and Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 46b-84.
|
|
| |
In re Rochelle D., FO04CP03005644A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION AT MIDDLETOWN, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where neither parent cared for their child since she was 11 months old and neither would be out of prison until she was at least 13 years old, and where agency showed that reunification efforts required by Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 17a-112(J)(1) failed and that further efforts would not be in the child's best interest, parental rights were terminated.
|
|
| |
Miller v. Karaoke, Inc., CV030283527S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 21, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Injured pedestrian's counts in amended personal injury complaint, alleging negligent and reckless service of excessive alcohol, were time-barred under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-584; they did not relate back to original complaint, which alleged only failure to keep premises free of snow and ice and failure to warn, as factual bases were so different.
|
|
| |
Papastavros v. Corbo, FA01075660,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 21, 2005, Decided , January 21, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The court considered several motions between a mother and a father regarding child visitation arrangements, and found that assuming the mother could be assured that the father provided an appropriate sleeping accommodation for the child and was at all times substance free, her apprehension about his visits would diminish.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback