 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Banks v. Warden, CV010446759S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ineffective assistance claims failed because suggestions of areas of cross-examination in inmate's brief would have had little or no effect on credibility of witnesses, transcript showed that counsel did a capable job in attempting to prevent consolidation of cases, and records of inmate's employment and other employees did not establish alibi.
|
|||||
| Cintron v. Meriden Square # 3, CV055000244S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied a management group's motion to strike apportionment complaint directed against it after claimant sued shopping center for slip and fall injuries; trial court had to assume for purpose of motion only the shopping center's claim that it did not own area in question and, thus, did not have a nondelegable duty to maintain it.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. Comm'r of Corr., (AC 25636),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues regarding reviewability of decision granting motion to withdraw were not debatable among jurists of reason and, therefore, were not worthy of review by the appellate court. Appeal of denial an inmate's petition for certification to appeal of dismissal of habeas petition was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Constas v. Tucci, CV010182864S, CV010182865S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for an attorney as to a claim under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570a to collect legal fees from an executor for legal services provided to the estate of the executor's deceased husband, as the attorney established that bills were sent to the administratrix, and the attorney did not have to establish that the fees were reasonable.
|
|||||
| Cooke v. Cooke, (AC 27536),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly granted the second wife summary judgment on a claim to discharge a judgment lien pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-51 where, inter alia, the marital dissolution judgment in favor of the first wife that was in effect on the date of imposition of the judgment lien was not a money judgment under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-350a(13).
|
|||||
| DiNuzzo v. Dan Perkins Chevrolet Geo, Inc., (AC 27337),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a decedent's treating physician's testimony was grounded in speculation and conjecture, insufficient evidence existed for a workers' compensation commissioner to have found that the decedent's death was causally related to a compensable injury, thus, an award of benefits to his widow, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-306(a), was reversed.
|
|||||
| Donofrio v. Donofrio, FA064005987S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage action, considering all of the evidence and the statutory factors in Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46b-81, 46b-82, the marriage was dissolved. The marriage had broken down irretrievably and there was no reasonable hope of reconciliation. The parties fought throughout the marriage, and it had escalated over the years.
|
|||||
| Elec. Wholesalers, Inc. v. M.J.B. Corp., (AC 26757),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As there was no meeting of the minds between a real property owner and purchasers as to sale of property, writings also did not indicate a meeting of the minds, and specific terms for a contract were not found therein to satisfy the statute of frauds, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-550, specific performance could not be ordered.
|
|||||
| Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LP, (SC 17489),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based on the facts known to a law firm, a reasonable attorney familiar with the law could have believed that the statutes of limitations was tolled by a retirement center's fraudulent concealment, therefore, summary judgment in favor of the law firm was upheld in the center's vexatious litigation suit brought pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-568.
|
|||||
| Gerardi v. City of Bridgeport, (AC 27190),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2007, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because fire inspector failed to file administrative appeal pursuant to Bridgeport, Conn., Charter § 206(a)(4) regarding city's failure to promote him, pursuant to the exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine, trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over fire inspector's suit arising from promotion issue, and dismissal was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
