 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Olympus Healthcare Group v. Caulin, CV020281644S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 23, 2003, Decided , January 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parents' motion to strike should have been granted where a healthcare provider alleged it gave care to their adult daughter, not them, and the parents were aware it expected to be compensated; allegations insufficiently stated a quantum meruit claim.
|
|||||
| Pridgen v. Smith, CV010813660S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 23, 2003, Decided , January 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver's cross-claim for indemnity from city and police officers after collision with state police cruiser was stricken, as municipal immunity protected city and officers, and driver's allegations did not state a claim for common-law indemnification.
|
|||||
| State v. One 2002 Chevrolet Coupe, CV2200243,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA-MILFORD, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 22 AT MILFORD, January 23, 2003, Decided , January 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the context of a car forfeiture case, there was insufficient evidence that the mother knew or should have known that her car was being used by the arrestee in his sale of drugs. It could not be inferred that the mother knew what her son was doing.
|
|||||
| Wickman v. Vecchiarelli, CV020282115S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 23, 2003, Decided , January 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court granted defense counsel's motion to dismiss an action filed by plaintiff, because defendant had died prior to the commencement of the action, and therefore the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Wyatt Energy v. Motiva Enters., X01CV020174090S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2003, Decided , January 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's motion for attorneys fees regarding its effort to require defendant to arbitrate rather than litigate its claims against plaintiff was denied, as agreement required any controversy or claim related to the agreement to be arbitrated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
