 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gorman v. Szewczak, CV010166633S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment to Connecticut's Dram Shop Act, which increased the limit on recoverable damages and included a new clause regarding the availability of common law negligence actions was found prospective in application.
|
|||||
| Leach v. Norwalk Hous. Auth., CV03403801S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a housing authority claimed that an injured party had not complied with the statutory notice requirements, the proper vehicle to raise the defense was through a motion for summary judgment, not a motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Link v. Link, CV020188018S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a brother and his wife transferred assets from the mother's account into their own account for their own use, they were held to have converted the funds, which were to be for the brother and sister equally, and damages were assessed.
|
|||||
| Nugent v. Breakwater Key Ass'n, CV030081995S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, GEOGRAPHIC AREA 5 AT DERBY, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As an attorney supplied requests for admission which supported all the essential elements of breach of contact and unjust enrichment claims, and a condominium association failed to provide any evidence, summary judgment was granted.
|
|||||
| Palermo v. Stonybrook Garden Coop., Inc., CV970343180,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rizzo v. Spinelli Assocs., CV03405802S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although plaintiff alleged sidewalk conditions constituted a nuisance, she failed to allege facts sufficient to establish she was in the exercise of a public right; defendant's motion to strike the second count of her complaint was granted.
|
|||||
| Rottier v. Town of Guilford, CVX2030480942,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an appeal from a decision of a zoning commission to grant a special permit to a supermarket, commission's motion to dismiss was denied where the commission claimed collateral estoppel but property owners' claim was similar on as to one paragraph.
|
|||||
| Stanchfield v. Mang, Inc., CV030176795S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sullivan v. Town of Westbrook, CV020098896S, CV020098897S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 23, 2004, Decided , January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Owners' appraiser relied on more accurate sales than town's appraiser in determining value of owners' property under comparative sales approach. Like owners' property, properties used by owners' appraiser were small and were located on small lots.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
