 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ochankowski v. Ochankowski, FA044000544,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where undisclosed encumbrance of commercial property meant that husband's contribution to payoff of marital home was smaller than expected, equitable distribution orders were modified to reduce the debt owed by wife to cover husband's share of marital home.
|
|||||
| Spellman v. S. New Eng. Tel. Co., CV044002651S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's motion to strike was granted because counts one and two of the employee's complaint were barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, and count three was not actionable under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.
|
|||||
| State v. Aggen, CR0081001,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under limited review of sentencing decisions permitted by Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq., there was no impropriety in imposing long sentence on sexual abuser of mentally disabled young boys, despite defendant's previous clean record and difficult childhood.
|
|||||
| State v. Jenkins, CR96484350,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant beat a 22-month-old child to death and delayed seeking medical treatment, a total effective sentence of 30 years' incarceration was in accordance with the parameters of Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq., and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194 et seq., and would not be modified.
|
|||||
| State v. Liborio A., (AC 26345),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 24, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sufficiency of the evidence challenge was rejected where it only challenged fact finder's decision to believe victim's testimony over testimony from defendants' witnesses; confrontation rights under U.S. Const. amend. VI were not violated where defendant amply challenged witness credibility and further examination was cumulative.
|
|||||
| State v. Lopez, (AC 26216),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 24, 2006, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendants pretended to have gun and threatened victim, they committed robbery by threat under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-134(a); holding victim by her backpack and arms was restraint to satisfy unlawful restraint convictions under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-96(a); convictions had elements not in common so no double jeopardy violation occurred.
|
|||||
| State v. Osoria, CR0200781, CR02210187,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of robbery, attempt to commit robbery, and two counts of accessory to larceny; pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-196(d), the Sentence Review Division ordered the superior court to modify the sentences imposed to a net effective sentence of 33 years execution suspended after 18 years incarceration and five years of probation.
|
|||||
| State v. Romero, CR01169757,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a sexual assault case, a sentence was proper, under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq., where the petitioner was 64 when he began preying upon his 8-year-old son, and the petitioner was facing 40 years in jail and received a sentence of 13 years of imprisonment, 3 more years than the mandatory minimum sentence.
|
|||||
| State v. Rupar, CR0173922,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where inmate was convicted of fourth degree sexual assault and risk of injury to minor and was ordered to serve consecutive terms that totaled at least seven years, modification was denied under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 43-23 et seq. and Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-194 et seq., as sentence was neither inappropriate nor disproportionate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
