|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 23, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
W. Am. Ins. Co. v. Tindall, CV054003262,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 23, 2007, Decided , January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court found subrogor could not recover on any of his claims against the roofing contractor, as time was not of the essence in completing the roofing work, no negligence was shown, and lack of workmanlike labor was not shown, but roofing contractor could recover on breach of contract counterclaim since second installment payment was not made.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback