 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amodio v. Amodio, (AC 15692),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment granted modification of child support reversed in dissolution action where amount of child support was agreed by the parties to be non-modifiable; thus, trial court failed to give effect to parties' agreement.
|
|||||
| Berlepsch v. Peck, 423137,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2000, Decided , January 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could seek apportionment based on alleged subsequent medical malpractice, if plaintiff sustained a single indivisible item of damage proximately caused by both defendant and physician apportionment defendants.
|
|||||
| FDIC v. Galluzzo, 405891,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2000, Decided , January 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgagors in foreclosure action could not seek declaratory judgment counterclaim against Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that they were not liable on note; such actions were prohibited by federal statute.
|
|||||
| Greg C's Appeal from Probate, (AC 18392),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Kasheema L., (AC 17767),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A mother's parental rights to her children were terminated as she was unable to care for her children, she had a high risk of relapse of substance abuse, and the children had strong emotional ties with their foster families.
|
|||||
| In re Nelson T., (AC 19586),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kane v. American Ins. Co., (SC 16104),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance company was not required to provide notice of policy termination to plaintiff where plaintiff had failed to renew her policy.
|
|||||
| Kronberg v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., CV 960254494S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 25, 2000, Decided , January 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On defendant insurance company's application, the court confirmed an arbitrator's award because it determined that the award was proper. Plaintiff motorist could not prove that he exhausted available insurance coverage.
|
|||||
| Office of Consumer Counsel v. Department of Pub. Util. Control, (SC 16106),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in dismissing consumer counsel's appeal of public utility's interim rate determination since interim rate decrease statute did not require power company to provide rate decrease by cash rate reduction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
