 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berkowitz v. City of Stamford, CV970158193S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The facts in defendant city's third party complaint against third-party defendant insurance company showed the possibility of coverage therefore triggering third-party defendant's duty to defend defendant city, a named insured.
|
|||||
| Cadle Co. v. Schwartz, CV970478613S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found deponents in contempt, as deponents willfully violated a court order to comply with subpoenas duces tecum served by plaintiff, and ordered deponents to comply with the subpoenas and to submit to depositions.
|
|||||
| Chisholm v. Mutual Mortg. Servs., CV990421560,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied a defendant's resubmission of a motion for summary judgment with prejudice. The motion was not accompanied by additional or new evidence, and involved the credibility of defendant, an issue more proper for the trier of fact.
|
|||||
| Cumberland Farms v. Town of Groton, CV960539192S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A merchant's claim of inverse condemnation was dismissed where its claim was precluded by a prior judgment, and it failed to show any deprivation of any reasonable use under the challenged zoning regulations.
|
|||||
| Fallstrom v. L.K. Comstock & Co., CV990152583S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer's revelation of employees' drug test results to supervisor was violation of statute prohibiting any such revelation prior to confirmation test. Issue of fact remained as to whether revelation was common law invasion of privacy.
|
|||||
| Gazza v. Bandit Indus., X03CV990499931S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION SESSION, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut products liability statutes permitted liberal joinder of defendants and later apportionment of responsibility in negligence-based actions. Cross-claim for indemnity stated a separate claim.
|
|||||
| Gazza v. Bandit Indus., X03CV990499931S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION SESSION, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted defendant logging company's motion to strike defendants', manufacturers of a woodchipper, cross-claim count under a state products liability law; the count was unnecessary and would only lead to confusion at trial.
|
|||||
| Gitelman v. Gitelman, FA000725844,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where foreign divorce was based on fraud, and parties continued to live together as husband and wife for 17 years, holding themselves out as married on immigration papers and tax returns, court refused to recognize divorce.
|
|||||
| Goodfield v. Town of Plymouth, CV980486389S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment motion in negligence action was denied where defendant failed to meet its burden of showing there was no genuine issue of material fact that less than two inches of snow accumulated on day of slip and fall accident.
|
|||||
| Kearney v. Hudson, FA000082189S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 22, 2001, Decided , January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut family court applied former significant connection/substantial evidence test to find that it had continuing jurisdiction over child removed to South Carolina without his father's knowledge.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
