 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Abatron, Inc. v. Reed Elsevier, CV020191987,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A complaint based primarily on a customer's claim that it had not received what it had bargained for stated a claim for breach of contract, but not for violation of Connecticut's unfair trade practices statute.
|
|||||
| Cagianello v. Cagianello, FA010076560S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court dissolved a marriage based on irretrievable breakdown, awarded wife alimony of $ 1 per year for so long as certain liabilities existed, and divided other property and debts. Husband's spending activity contradicted his claim of no income.
|
|||||
| Campi v. Town of Winchester, CV020088642S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's failure to exhaust administrative remedies and lack of standing meant his breach of collective bargaining agreement claims had to be dismissed, but he did state cognizable claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
|
|||||
| Cole v. Comm'r of Corr., CV980411658,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was denied habeas corpus relief where he failed to prove actual innocence because his only witness at the habeas trial was a convicted felon who the court did not believe and where the evidence at criminal trial was sufficient to convict.
|
|||||
| Gagne v. Lacombe, FA020097408S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was ordered to pay the mother $ 600 in child support arrearage and $ 120 to defray the mother's costs and fees in enforcing the parties' prior agreement. The father's nonpayment of child support was not willfully contemptuous.
|
|||||
| Giulietti v. City of New Haven, CV010453664,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Gomez v. Payne, Inc., CV010184054,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Off-duty Connecticut state patrolmen were immune from an apportionment action by truck drivers who alleged negligently caused a motorist's death; statutory multiple damages could only be recovered from a driver, not a truck owner.
|
|||||
| Hamel v. Hamel, FA010085880S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's motion for the state to pay to prepare a transcript of pretrial proceedings in a dissolution action was denied; the husband did not have a right to have the state pay for preparing a transcript except in conjunction with an appeal.
|
|||||
| Krom v. Atkinson, CV02078710,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a debtor was current on his payments and a property conveyance merely repositioned the parties to their historical position, the creditor was not entitled to a prejudgment remedy based on non-payment or fraudulent transfer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
