|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 25, 2006
|
| |
Ahmad v. Yale-New Haven Hosp., CV040183725S(CLD),
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion for class certification was denied because patients failed to satisfy the predominance test, when the court found that common issues of law and fact would not be the object of most of the efforts of the litigants.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Benvenuti Oil Co. v. Foss Consultants, Inc., CV010485270S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: CUTPA claim was dismissed since programmer's fraud on court by forging contract did not impact trade or commerce as defined by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a(4); though programmer breached exclusivity of contract, company did not establish method of calculating lost profits; company's nominal damage award allowed attorney fees as punitive damages.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Calusine v. General Growth Properties/Homart, Inc., CV040834029S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a patron filed suit for injuries sustained when she fell on the floor of a shopping mall, a subcontractor was entitled to summary judgment under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 17-49 because it was not in control of the area. Another subcontractor admitted that its employees covered up the uneven ledge with a strip of tape.
|
|
| |
Dillard v. Warden, CV020463040S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since there was not a scintilla of evidence to prove that a prisoner was prejudiced as a result of counsel's conduct in advising him not to testify, and therefore the prisoner failed to prove a violation of U.S. Const. amend. VI or Conn. Const. art. I, § 8, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
King v. King, FA044000428S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Since the husband earned $ 1,210 net per week income and the wife, who had a bipolar disorder, could work up to four hours a day and could earn up to $ 830 a month and still keep her social security, the husband was ordered to pay lifetime alimony of $ 150 per week to the wife.
|
|
| |
Kline v. New Haven Bd. of Educ., CV014004297S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: School board properly terminated a tenured teacher pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-151(d), as the teacher's act of calling a student a racially derogatory name was not protected by his right to freedom of speech, as the comment was merely a statement of the teacher's opinion, and did not touch on an area of public concern.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|