 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Green Point Bank v. Klein, CV 970327058S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgagor's defense to foreclosure action that mortgage was result of "mistake" as to who owned property survived mortgagee's motion to strike because defense attacked making and validity of mortgage.
|
|||||
| Kowalonek v. Bryant Lane, CV 960324942S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff waived attorney-client privilege, because plaintiff and attorney disclosed substantial, detailed, and specific communications on the record in a state grievance hearing initiated against attorney by the plaintiff.
|
|||||
| O'Bryan v. O'Bryan, FA 900110984S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child support modification granted; deviation from the guidelines was necessary as it was in the best interest of both children to implement the increase in the amount of their support.
|
|||||
| Office of Consumer Counsel v. Connecticut Dep't of Pub. Util. Control, CV 990497239S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stay as to establishment of minimum bid in auction of Connecticut Light and Power Company's nuclear assets was denied as it was adverse to public interest.
|
|||||
| Office of Consumer Counsel v. Connecticut Dep't of Pub. Util. Control, CV 990497597S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reddick v. Warden, CV 940544819,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Result of proceedings would not have been different absent counsel's alleged errors and representation met objective standard of reasonableness, but counsel admittedly failed to preserve right to sentence review.
|
|||||
| Repko v. Fitness Connection, CV 980332773S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there were questions related to causation, summary judgment was denied for gym in plaintiff's case for personal injuries against gym for possible negligent acts of one of the gym's patrons.
|
|||||
| Ross v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 18700),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sloan v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 19646),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of writ of habeas corpus affirmed; petitioner failed to sustain his burden of proving that counsel's performance was deficient and that he suffered actual prejudice as a result thereof.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
