 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rowan v. Briasco, CV 990088887,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 25, 2000, Decided , January 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to strike defendant homeowner's counterclaim for indemnification from intervenor employer, in employee's tort suit, was granted since exclusivity provision of Connecticut's Workers' Compensation Act barred counterclaim.
|
|||||
| State v. Baines, (AC 19457),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not substantially prejudiced by being tried with co-defendant whose statement to police neither named nor incriminated defendant directly, and jury was instructed not to use statement against defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Jenkins, (AC 19458),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and other convictions were affirmed; court properly excluded defense evidence contesting whereabouts of eyewitness, and allowed evidence with respect to coconspirators.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Thomas, FA 960153748S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 25, 2000, Decided , January 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband was entitled to relief from alimony obligation after he lost his job and his employer stopped severance payments due to its impending bankruptcy, but permanent relief was premature until bankruptcy was resolved.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
