|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 6, 2002
|
| |
Rand Constr. v. Walker, CV010095884S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In contractor's defamation suit, court granted summary judgment to persons who complained to state wetlands agency about local wetlands agency and contractor's compliance, since quasi-judicial complaint was immune as part of formal procedure.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Santiago v. Comm'r of Corr., CV000599710,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Sherman v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., CV990078688S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Insurance applicant's knowing misrepresentation, when applying for additional life insurance, that his cancer was in remission, voided insurer's obligation under insurance policy and allowed it to seek rescission of insurance policy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. Beckett, X03CV0497890S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: During the representation, there was considerable interaction between the client and the law firm. The court held the client had significant purposeful contacts with Connecticut and there was specific jurisdiction over the client.
|
|
| |
Weil v. Macri, CV020459617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court denied defendant's motion to dismiss replevin action under prior pending action doctrine since replevin could not be asserted as a counterclaim in other action, which was for dissolution of parties' alleged partnership.
|
|
| |
Weil v. Macri, CV020459617S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 6, 2002, Decided , March 6, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Owner proved that he was sole owner of puppets, that puppets were not assets of partnership, and that partner wrongfully retained them. Affidavit sufficiently complied with statute, but bond was insufficient.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback