|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 24, 2003
|
| |
Lane v. Eisenberg, CV020812699S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A property owner's apportionment complaint alleging that apportionment defendants caused a defective condition that caused the injured party's fall was stricken, as, under the circumstances, the owner could not bring such an action.
|
|
| |
Moutinho v. Bridgeport Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV970345450S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: There was no evidence that the property owner sought or obtained a special permit to establish an adult entertainment facility as a legal use of his property. Nor did his renovation of the property irrevocably commit it to such a use.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Re/Max Bell Park Realty v. Lehto, CV000063234,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a real estate client did not show that a lease tended to impose injury on the public, was prejudicial to the public good, or was in violation of public policy, the lease was valid, and the real estate corporation was awarded a commission.
|
|
| |
Sabino v. Adams, CV990269554,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 24, 2003, Decided , January 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback