 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Milne v. Ryea, CV010811597S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 26, 2004, Decided , January 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney who initially represented defendant in a personal injury case was then employed by the firm representing plaintiff, he was not disqualified, as a "Chinese wall" could be constructed to avoid any impropriety.
|
|||||
| Pasacreta v. Hiebel & Roeder Family & Child Assocs., CV020099876,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 26, 2004, Decided , January 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion for summary judgment as to a patient's intentional infliction of emotional distress, reckless and wanton misconduct, and breach of fiduciary duty claims was granted as the patient failed to file a certificate of good faith.
|
|||||
| Salvatore v. Knight, CV020173897S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 26, 2004, Decided , January 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a jury awarded plaintiff economic damages but no non-economic damages, the court reviewed the record and concluded that such a determination was unreasonable, inadequate, and inconsistent; additur was granted.
|
|||||
| Temponi v. Vivar, CV010807053,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 26, 2004, Decided , January 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Injured persons' motion to set aside verdict and to grant additur where jury awarded them economic damages, but did not award them any non-economic damages, was denied as the verdict was not shocking because they only sustained minor injuries.
|
|||||
| Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of Am., File No. X01 CV-03 0181305S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 26, 2004, Decided , January 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike purchasers' claim alleging breach of implied warranty in the sale of consumer electronics was granted as to claim alleging breach of implied warranty; the purchasers failed to provide the notice required by statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
