 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., X07CV044001612S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT ROCKVILLE, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's motion for class certification was denied as to claims that a restaurant violated minimum wage laws under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-60 by unlawfully deducting tip credits from servers' wages, because the employees failed to meet the requirement of class-wide predominance of issues required by Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 9-8.
|
|||||
| Spicer v. Spicer, FA054101601S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a marital dissolution action, the marriage had broken down irretrievably, and the marriage was dissolved. Among other orders, the husband was to pay one dollar per year in alimony, to be modifiable only in the event he failed to pay his share of the debts the court ordered him to pay. No counsel fees were awarded.
|
|||||
| State v. Andrew M., CR2330469,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal or for a new trial as to his conviction of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-21(a)(2) was denied, as the fact that the conviction may have been inconsistent with other acquittals did not invalidate the conviction, and the conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
|
|||||
| Varnavelias v. Wood, CV030522135S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an individual's objections to the doctor selected by the driver to perform an independent medical examination did not have any facts to back up her allegations that the doctor was biased, the trial court overruled the individual's objections under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 13-11.
|
|||||
| Wallace v. Gerard Med., Inc., CV000274660S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 25, 2006, Decided , January 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action alleging that an implanted surgical device was defective, the patient's expert testimony was sufficient to satisfy the Connecticut Products Liability Act. The fact finder could find, where other identifiable causes were absent, that the mere evidence of a malfunction was sufficient evidence of a defect.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
