 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mozell v. Warden, CV970404751S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2007, Decided , January 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner; he failed to prove ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to Conn. Const. amend. art. XXIX and the Sixth Amendment, he had not proved his claim of actual innocence, and he had not produced "newly discovered evidence" sufficient to overcome the state's evidence.
|
|||||
| Tracy v. C.C.'s Cleaning & Supply, Inc., CV065005489S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2007, Decided , January 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-427(c), homeowners were entitled to punitive damages and attorney's fees for a violation of CUTPA because home improvement contract with painting contractor did not comply with Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-429(a) in that it did not include a notice of homeowners' cancellation rights in accordance with Conn. Gen. Stat. ch. 140.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
