 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Coleman, AC 29158,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, June 2, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's convictions under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿¿ 21a-278(b), -279(a), and -279(d) because his actual possession of cocaine found at his feet when he was arrested was proved beyond a reasonable doubt, as he was the only person seen handling the drugs, so it could be inferred that he dropped them just before his arrest.
|
|||||
| Sturgeon v. Sturgeon, AC 29619,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, June 2, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to set aside a verdict rendered in favor of one brother in a second brother's negligence action because the remarks of first brother's counsel regarding expert testimony constituted a comment on the state of the evidence and were not improper. Counsel provided a foundation for his comment.
|
|||||
| Total Recycling Servs. of Conn. v. Conn. Oil Recycling Servs., LLC, AC 29721,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, June 2, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When sellers were awarded damages against a buyer for unjust enrichment related to a contract, it was error to reject, out of hand, the buyer's motion for attorney's fees because a jury found the sellers breached two other contracts with the buyer, which contained attorney's fee provisions that did not require the buyer to prove more than a breach.
|
|||||
| Zenon v. Mossy, AC 29668,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, June 2, 2009, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the trial court initially admitted a copy of prior court decisions against a buyer, it later reversed its ruling and determined that the evidence constituted inadmissible extrinsic evidence under Conn. Code Evid. R. 6-6(b)(2); accordingly, the seller failed to show harm or reversible error.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
