|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 24, 2005
|
| |
Cmty. Realty Investors, Inc. v. Vasquenza, CV044000286S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Edwards v. Ashken, CV040201106,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Defendants' motion to strike was denied in plaintiffs' claims alleging defendants planned to build on their lot in a manner that would violate deed, zoning, and common development scheme restrictions and obstruct views. An attack on plaintiffs' standing was premised on extrinsic evidence because it relied on facts not alleged in the complaint.
|
|
| |
Guzzi v. Guzzi, FA020394548,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Kemper Auto & Home Ins. Co. v. State, 569339,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Employee's motion to dismiss a recklessness action filed by an insurer was denied because the employee was not protected by common law or statutory immunity under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 4-165. Inter alia, the complaint alleged that the employee acted recklessly by failing to warn drivers of a high speed response under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 14-283.
|
|
| |
MD Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. MLS Constr., LLC, CV030483616S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
New Fairfield BOE v. Cortese, CV030349701S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Parents did not breach a settlement agreement with a board of education for seeking to challenge their child's proposed individual education plan in a due process hearing, as to the extent the terms of the agreement were inconsistent with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C.S. ? 1400 et seq., they were unenforceable.
|
|
| |
Perkins Family P'ship, LLC v. E. Coast Classics, LLC, CV040085123S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Telerent Leasing Corp. v. Morgan Inn, LLC, 565197,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Leasing company's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ? 17-49 was denied, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to an individual defendant's liability, whether satellite equipment was defective, and other issues.
|
|
| |
Uvalic v. Driscoll, CV030828393S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 24, 2005, Decided , January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court granted injured party and father's motion to dismiss pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. ? 10-31 a daughter and father's apportionment complaint filed against prospective apportionment party; neither proper abode service under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-54 nor timely service under Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 52-102b(a) were shown.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback