 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| ATC P'shp v. Town of Windham, (SC 16173),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 14, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant municipality's attempts to coerce property sale at low price by threatening condemnation proceeding and using police to prevent plaintiff's access did not sustain civil rights action under substantive due process.
|
|||||
| Agosto v. Midstate Med. Ctr., CV 990266516S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Simple negligence in a personal injury action was not transformed into a medical malpractice claim, which required a certificate of good faith under statute, merely because it occurred in a hospital facility.
|
|||||
| Andretta v. Rudig, CV 99065340,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Liability apportionment to unidentifiable "John Does" in negligence case was improper because they could never obtain party status; however, those who designed, constructed, and installed playground could be impleaded.
|
|||||
| Ardito v. North Branford Water Pollution Control Auth., CV 940368201S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Presumption of regularity, validity and correctness of a special benefit and resulting assessment was imposed on property owner even though he did not utilize the benefit, and failed to establish disparity in market value.
|
|||||
| Cintron v. Valentin, FA 990498286,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 14, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the acknowledgement of paternity needed to be filed with the Department of Health, it was a public record and only a certified copy of the acknowledgement was admissible as evidence in a petition for support.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. Wezner, 411659,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's attorney was not remiss in advising him not to testify, since the inconsistencies in his testimony were manifold, nor was his attorney ineffective in failing to investigate a note given to petitioner by victim.
|
|||||
| Emc Mortg. Corp. v. Lask, CV 990335071S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant's special defense pleadings were defective, plaintiff was granted a motion to strike in an action on a note and mortgage in a foreclosure action and the court upon request provided articulated rationale.
|
|||||
| FDIC v. Thompson, (AC 19118),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, December 14, 1999, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Findings about delay between foreclosure and deficiency judgments not error; defendants never objected to extensions and did not prove unreasonableness claims; no evidence existed that deed in lieu of sale was ever offered.
|
|||||
| Facas v. Facas, 552475,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child custody dispute when mother fled jurisdiction with child out of fear of physical abuse, best interests of child required contact with father, but it was not in child's best interests to change environment before de novo review.
|
|||||
| Fortune v. City of New London, CV 970082795S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, December 14, 1999, Decided , December 14, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Player injured from crash into basket support pole at city court had negligence suit dismissed; governmental immunity applied to discretionary acts to warn, inspect, repair, and pad; identifiable victim/imminent harm exception did not apply.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
