 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Altern v. Land-Tech Consultants, CV980146742,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action over land sale, seller was granted summary judgment on buyer's fraud and unfair trade practices claims because buyer did not rely on seller's misrepresentations and seller was not engaged in trade of selling real estate.
|
|||||
| Anastasia v. Beautiful You Hair Designs, Inc., (AC 19052),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyer of hair salon properly showed fraud when seller made misrepresentations about the business' vitality and client base to induce her the purchase the business.
|
|||||
| Billerback v. Cerminara, CV980333002S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the clear language of the statute, an extension of the statute of limitations was allowed only where plaintiff failed to obtain judgment by reason of failure to name the right person as defendant, and not by reason of dormancy.
|
|||||
| Citicorp Mortg. v. Gibson, CV990152248S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgage company's motion for summary judgment in foreclosure action was granted. Defendants did not specially plead payment as special defense, and special defense based on covenant of good faith failed to allege facts in its support.
|
|||||
| Del Negro's Mkt. v. Santilli, CV980580221S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Recusal was not required under Connecticut judicial ethics canons for premature credibility determination where judge had to decide parties' relative credibility to decide one party's motion to dismiss fraud action.
|
|||||
| Freddo v. Access Agency, CV000555736,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Negligence claim for loss of job opportunities damages, possible eviction, and inability to make support payments arising from failure of day care to administer medication to child denied where consequences were too remote to allow recovery.
|
|||||
| Gilmore Constr. v. Webster Bank, CV00069111S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where account owner removed another's name from bank account, yet that person continued to withdraw funds, bank claimed proper removal procedures were not followed by account owner; thus genuine issues of fact remained for trial.
|
|||||
| In re Brian S., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, JUVENILE MATTERS, CHILD PROTECTION SESSION, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court terminated respondents' parental rights to the child in question, because respondent mother failed to rehabilitate her substance abuse problem, and respondents, legal and putative fathers, had abandoned the child.
|
|||||
| Jarrar v. New Canaan Glass & Mirror, CV000372441,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
