 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jones v. Naugatuck Treatment Co., CV98014652S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Connecticut trial court had jurisdiction over landowners' action seeking injunctive relief from and monetary damages for foul odors and diminished property values caused by sewage treatment plant.
|
|||||
| Lawson v. Lawson, CV990080780S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parental immunity did not bar daughter's claim against mother for negligent failure to prevent father's sexual abuse of daughter. Same statute of limitations applied to claims against father for abuse, and mother for failing to prevent abuse.
|
|||||
| Mackie v. Hull, CV980078427S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where deed to plaintiffs, and three previous deeds, listed southerly boundary of property as southerly boundary of abandoned highway, court would not read ambiguity into deed to find true boundary was center line of highway.
|
|||||
| Morales v. Rios, FA000631089,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, FAMILY SUPPORT MAGISTRATE DIVISION, January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied defendant's motion to open the judgment concerning defendant's acknowledgement of paternity for plaintiff's child, because defendant failed to show that he signed the acknowledgment under duress from plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Rosa Bros. v. Mansi, (AC 19665),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order requiring appellant to pay sanctions for failure to comply with discovery was not a final appealable order, and thus appellate court did not have jurisdiction over appeal from sanctions order.
|
|||||
| Rotondi v. Rotondi, FA000377065S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a family law matter, the wife was awarded physical custody of parties' five children, alimony, child support pendente lite, and exclusive possession of the marital premises pendente lite.
|
|||||
| Sauer v. Hawthorne Cove Prop. Owner's Ass'n, CV990336676S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In reviewing an application for a prejudgment remedy, the court was required to determine whether probable cause existed that an injured mail carrier would have obtained a judgment in an amount equal to or greater than the remedy sought.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Old Lyme Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 552756,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 23, 2001, Decided , January 23, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The extension of a seasonal nonconforming use to year round use constituted an illegal extension of a nonconforming use.
|
|||||
| State v. Beall, (AC 18469),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly limited defendant's cross-examination of a prosecution witness; the court limited impeachment evidence to that involving veracity, and defendant failed to show the witness's prior convictions implicated their veracity.
|
|||||
| State v. Hallowell, (AC 20074),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 23, 2001, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was safely in his home, but chose to leave and shoot a shotgun at car that was moving away from him, evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction of manslaughter, and State's burden of disproving self-defense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
