|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 27, 2004
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Guastella v. Mancini, CV990154762S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Property owner's summary judgment motion in a personal injury action was denied, because triable issues of fact existed on where the injured party fell, and on whether the owner had control over the area where the fall occurred.
|
|
| |
KLM Indus. v. Fleming, CV950069725S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Builder's motion to open and vacate a default judgment was denied; the trial court had jurisdiction to enter the default, as the builder was served process by mail at a location which served as the builder's usual place of residence.
|
|
| |
Lamountain v. Manson Youth Inst., CV030483411S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Middleton v. Cobb, CV03081198,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where challenged allegations stated that a builder committed several violations of the Home Improvement Act, which were sufficient to state a per se violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, a motion to strike was denied.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback