 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kosienski v. City of Meriden, CV020282973S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mandamus was awarded to former police chiefs to compel a city's pension board to award them proper pension benefits where the board was the only body that the former chiefs could turn to for relief and it was not following statutory mandates of 25 Conn. Spec. Acts 977, No. 229, § 2 (1949), as amended by 26 Conn. Spec. Acts 947, No. 340 (1953).
|
|||||
| Kuen v. Kuen, FA870258987S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Though a provision in a divorce judgment that required an ex-husband to pay a portion of any family inheritance received to his ex-wife was contrary to law when made, the provision was enforced to avoid prejudice and to uphold the principles in favor of the finality of judgments.
|
|||||
| Kwasnicki v. Sinopoli, FA030734241,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court ordered joint legal custody and shared residential custody of the parties' minor daughter and set forth the various parameters for the parents to follow, having considered all of the statutory factors for custody and visitation set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 46b-56, 46b-56a, and 46b-84.
|
|||||
| Langewisch v. New England Residential Servs., CV04004000610S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The co-administrators erroneously failed to file a certificate of merit pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-190a with regard to the group home operator. The co-administrator alleged a claim of medical malpractice against the operator as it alleged that the operator failed to take appropriate medical action when the decedent's health deteriorated.
|
|||||
| Lawrence v. Lawrence, FA940543624,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A father was held in contempt of court for failing to pay child support because he admitted that he had the ability to pay the support but failed to do so because the mother did not provide him with a particular tax form and his income had dropped significantly, though his financial statements were found to lack credibility.
|
|||||
| Lindsay v. Lindsay, FA030082710S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Little v. State Office of the Claims Comm'r, 044000265,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the absence of either a waiver of sovereign immunity under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-141 or indication that State had consented to suit, employee's complaint seeking appeal of its dismissal of her employment discrimination complaint filed with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities was barred by doctrine of sovereign immunity.
|
|||||
| Martino v. DOL, CV030082676S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Medical Assocs. of N. Haven, L.L.C. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., File No. CV-04 0488803S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2005, Decided , January 25, 2005, Memorandum, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer refused coverage for mercury spilled in insured party's building on ground that contract only covered cleanup of pollutants spilled on land, insurer was not entitled to summary judgment in breach of contract case. Because land was not otherwise defined, well-established legal meaning of term, which included buildings, was applicable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
