 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Miller v. Option One Mortgage, CV054006787S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Senior appraiser was a managing agent of a mortgage company for purposes of Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 13-29, and as the company had filed a counterclaim in the case, the appraiser could be compelled to attend a deposition in Connecticut as a "plaintiff" in the case.
|
|||||
| Powers v. Torres, CV040833380,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the mere stopping of the vehicle could not reasonably be interpreted as a signal to proceed, the stopping of the vehicle, even if it was arguably unsafe to do so under the circumstances, was not the proximate cause of the pedestrian's death.
|
|||||
| Simsbury-Avon Pres. Soc'y, LLC v. Town of Simsbury, X01CV044001892S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT WATERBURY, January 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preservation society's claim for mandamus relief against a town was dismissed because society had failed to show that exhaustion of administrative remedies would be futile. Apportionment complaint against agency officials was also dismissed because it was untimely under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-102b; thus, court lacked personal jurisdiction over them.
|
|||||
| Tuttle v. Tuttle, FA044000799,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2006, Decided , January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the marriage between the parties had broken down irretrievably and there was no reasonable prospect of reconciliation, the marriage was dissolved.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
