LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 25, 2007

  
Std. Fire Ins. Co. v. Drummey, CV065002071, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Motion to strike special defense under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. 10-50 alleging that attorney was insured under insurance policy because attorney was acting under power of attorney from insured was denied since special defense was not inconsistent with complaint, which alleged that there was insurance policy between insurer and insured.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Welzenbach v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Group, CV064021525, Opinion No.: 96923, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court granted former employer's motion to strike; terminated employee did not allege sufficient facts to sustain breach of contract claim against former employer, did not allege proper facts to show recklessness, and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq., did not apply to employer-employee relationship.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilson v. London, FA030734774, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Based on the parties' 2005 tax returns, and taking into consideration the mother's entitlement to an earned income credit and the father's support of another child who was not issue of the parties, the father was ordered to pay the mother $ 163 per week in child support for their two minor children.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wyse v. Wyse, FA064005176S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a divorce action, because neither party presented convincing evidence that the present visitation arrangement was causing harm to the children, the husband was ordered to continue to have visitation at the marital home on alternate weekends, but his weekday visitation was to be off premises.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.