|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 25, 2007
|
| |
Std. Fire Ins. Co. v. Drummey, CV065002071,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Motion to strike special defense under Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. 10-50 alleging that attorney was insured under insurance policy because attorney was acting under power of attorney from insured was denied since special defense was not inconsistent with complaint, which alleged that there was insurance policy between insurer and insured.
|
|
| |
Welzenbach v. Hartford Fin. Servs. Group, CV064021525, Opinion No.: 96923,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court granted former employer's motion to strike; terminated employee did not allege sufficient facts to sustain breach of contract claim against former employer, did not allege proper facts to show recklessness, and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. ? 42-110a et seq., did not apply to employer-employee relationship.
|
|
| |
Wilson v. London, FA030734774,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based on the parties' 2005 tax returns, and taking into consideration the mother's entitlement to an earned income credit and the father's support of another child who was not issue of the parties, the father was ordered to pay the mother $ 163 per week in child support for their two minor children.
|
|
| |
Wyse v. Wyse, FA064005176S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a divorce action, because neither party presented convincing evidence that the present visitation arrangement was causing harm to the children, the husband was ordered to continue to have visitation at the marital home on alternate weekends, but his weekday visitation was to be off premises.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback