 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Ramirez, AC 27707,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 15, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as defendant's conviction for assault under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53a-60(a)(2) and acquittal of carrying dangerous weapon under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 53-206 were not legally inconsistent as use required for assault did not necessitate carrying.
|
|||||
| State v. Wright, AC 27407,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 15, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as prior testimony was properly admitted under Conn. Code Evid. R. 8-6(1) as State showed due diligence in attempting to procure witness to testify at trial since inspector looked for witness for nine days, and went to all addresses revealed by checking motor vehicle and Connecticut Department of Correction files.
|
|||||
| Sutherland v. Sutherland, AC 27858,
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 15, 2008, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as separation agreement was not post-majority support order under Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 46b-66 since child support clause provided required Conn. Gen. Stat. ¿ 46b-84(a) support by using dollar amount for support of all children. It did not provide mechanism for dividing support between children once elder child reached majority.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
