|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - January 27, 2004
|
| |
Ogilvy v. Ogilvy, FA020187463S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The evidence indicates that this marriage has broken down irretrievably, and judgment may enter dissolving the marriage on that ground.
|
|
| |
Raiford v. Armstrong, 553677,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An inmate was only entitled to credit for pretrial confinement for periods where he was incarcerated solely due to his inability to post bail; accordingly, where he was serving another sentence at the time, he was entitled to no credit.
|
|
| |
Rocque v. Kobyluck Sand & Gravel, CV030822253,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The environmental agency's motion to strike special defenses to allow individuals to bring before the court any "heavy-handed" conduct on the part of the sovereign so the court could fairly and equitably make its decision was denied.
|
|
| |
Sinchak v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, CV030826293,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 27, 2004, Decided , January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court adopted agreed procedure for unrepresented correctional institution inmate's telephonic participation in freedom of information commission (FOIC) appeals and remanded for FOIC to conduct his hearing in accordance with that procedure.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stock v. Pavlucik, CV02977632,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT MILFORD, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a zoning enforcement matter, homeowners' motion to dismiss for mootness was denied, but a zoning enforcement officer's motion to strike their special defenses was granted, as they were moot after the homeowners obtained a permit.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback