 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. Gallaway, CV000340749S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ordering an administrator of an estate to specifically perform the terms of a contract for the sale of estate property would have usurped the authority of the probate court.
|
|||||
| Chadha v. Shimelman, CV990079402S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a motion for summary judgment, when the issues raised involved the credibility and possible motives of defendant doctors against a plaintiff doctor, the issues were material and were required to be settled by a trier of fact.
|
|||||
| Commissioner of Transp. v. Knight, 61515,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where Connecticut Commissioner of Transportation took only a portion of defendants' property pursuant to eminent domain powers, court found value of property was underestimated by commissioner's appraiser.
|
|||||
| Fenton v. Area Coop. Educ. Servs., X07CV980073702S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET, January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regional education center's motion for summary judgment was granted as to counts alleging intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress because those claims were barred by sovereign immunity. Statutory claim remained.
|
|||||
| Goldblatt v. Ambro, CV980410318,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered for law firm in action against executrix for attorneys fees. When action was commenced, executrix had not yet rejected claim against estate, and thus statute of limitation had not yet begun to run.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Day Kimball Hosp. of Windham County, 063592,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINDHAM, AT PUTNAM, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In medical malpractice action, hospital's motion to strike claim alleging severe emotional distress during labor and delivery of child was denied where mother was not bystander, but patient to whom hospital owed duty of care.
|
|||||
| LeClair v. BankBoston, N.A., CV990497186S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Apportionment claim could not rely upon statute which applied only in circumstances where the original case ended because of failure to name the right defendant as a basis to save the claim from being untimely.
|
|||||
| Lease Corp. of Am. v. S.A. Hotels, CV000438547S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Difference in spelling between certificate and writ was immaterial and judgment was not void. Defendant did not attack Michigan court's judgment in Connecticut court. Thus, plaintiff recovered $ 13,063 from defendant.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Axiom Lab., CV980584562,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 24, 2001, Decided , January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In awarding past and future economic damages, the jury made a conscious decision to put a former employee in the same position he would have been in had he never taken the position with his former employer, no more and no less.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
