LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - January 25, 2002

  
Butler Props. v. Butler, CV010277381S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Company member and lessee were necessary parties because they had interest in outcome. Company did not show absolute right to partition. Company's allegations supported cause of action for partition or sale of property.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Cecchi v. Crane Nuclear, CV010804364S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Consumer Incentive Servs. Int'l v. Memberworks, Inc., CV99362655S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Existence of contract was fact question to be determined by trier. For offer and acceptance sufficient to create contract, each must had to have been based on identical understanding of parties. Summary judgment was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Debarros v. Warden, 558888, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Quality and proprieties of detention did not result in constitutional deprivation of rights because water was potable, there were efforts to reduce flies, and prisoner had no right to eat in mess hall.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Emmanuel Baptist Church of Newington v. Pane Enters., CV010810812, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Without giving property owner any receipted allocations, claimant lacked probable cause to believe he had approval to incur additional expenses. Therefore, he failed to establish validity of mechanics' lien.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
FDIC v. Caldrello, (AC 20144), APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, January 25, 2002, * Officially Released* January 25, 2002, the date that this decision was released as a slip opinion, is the operative date for all substantive and procedural purposes.
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court was presented with sufficient evidence demonstrating that the FDIC did not receive notice of the entry of the nonsuit in a timely manner and that it filed its motion to open within four months of receiving notice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Frazier v. Konopka, CV980490379S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Jury's verdict was not against the evidence as the decision not to award non-economic damages was entirely plausible and consistent. Evidence showed that the collision was low impact and that the medical evidence was inconsistent.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Grunsell v. Saaf, CV000338514S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There was nothing in contract or circumstances surrounding contract to suggest owner acted unreasonably or breached contract in the time it took for him to make repairs. He was not entitled to broker's or attorney's fees but recovered rent.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Andrew Michael C., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, JUVENILE MATTERS, January 25, 2002, Decided , January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Father's parental rights were terminated on grounds of, inter alia, abandonment, where father showed minimal interest in son and made no effort to address issues that hindered reunification, and where termination was in child's best interests.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kettles v. Paul, CV99363142S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court was merely to determine if jury's award was reasonable. Jury could discount fact that medical expert ascribed permanent injury and determine that injured party's complaints of pain were unjustified.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.