 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bracken v. O'Charek, CV990594529,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was entered in favor of a police officer in a personal injury action against an arrestee, as the court found that the arrestee intentionally kicked the officer in the chest during an arrest, and that she was conscious of her actions.
|
|||||
| Bridgeport Redevelopment Agency v. Gay, CV990366771,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a just compensation case, the capitalization of income approach was the appropriate method of valuation. It was also appropriate to accept and reject portions of each appraiser's testimony to reach a compromise between the conflicting evidence.
|
|||||
| Ciliberto v. Ciliberto, FA010185229S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court declined to find as a matter of law that a minor child of divorcing parents would have been afforded a higher education if the family remained intact, and accordingly no such order was entered.
|
|||||
| Dubose v. Ortiz, CV000439988S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a driver failed to support his version of an automobile accident with any evidence, and because he testified falsely on a key issue, the court did not give credence to his testimony and held he did not meet his burden of proving fault.
|
|||||
| Fedus v. Colchester Conservation Comm'n, 124376,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a conservation commission carefully considered the statutory criteria in making its decision to approve an inland wetlands and watercourses application by a retail developer, the decision was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Fedus v. Colchester Zoning & Planning Comm'n, 125928,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As appealing individuals neglected to name a town clerk in the citation, they failed also, by implication, to give proper notice to the zoning and planning commission. Therefore, the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal.
|
|||||
| Harbour Landing Condo. Ass'n v. PMG Land Assocs., Ltd. P'shp, CV020459152,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a request for a clarification of a prior order, the court clarified and limited a lis pendens over which a condominium association asserted a prescriptive easement.
|
|||||
| Jewish Home for the Elderly v. Cantore, CV960155519S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment in skilled nursing facility's action seeking compensation for services because there was an issue of fact as to whether prior litigation ended in a final judgment such that res judicata was applicable.
|
|||||
| Mainville v. Zoning Comm'n of Meriden, CV980265281S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A court determined that further court proceedings were unnecessary regarding discovery of matters involving the erection of signs warning citizens of a proposed zone change. A motion to seal the records was denied.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
