 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atwood v. Buon Appetite, CV 980419188S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant bar owners, as possessors of the land, had no duty to plaintiff patron to guard against injuries sustained at an unknown distance from their premises and under circumstances wholly outside their knowledge or control.
|
|||||
| Engdall v. Wadsworth Family, 543880,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Right of first refusal to purchase property was not void as an unreasonable restraint on alienation when it lacked specific mention of duration and price terms, as long as those terms could be readily ascertained.
|
|||||
| Imfeld v. Town of West Hartford, CV 970479691,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for summary judgment was denied because issues of material fact existed as to whether defendant's actions were wholly for the public's direct benefit and were discretionary.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Salinas, CV 990496644S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court affirmed the suspension of plaintiff's motor vehicle operator's license because plaintiff was not prejudiced by the improper admission of a copy of a report when other substantial evidence established the offense.
|
|||||
| Moseley v. Moseley, FA 980077011,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, AT LITCHFIELD, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife received divorce, property settlement, alimony, and attorney fees from husband.
|
|||||
| Western Sur. Co. v. State Dmv, CV 990494408S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, December 15, 1999, Decided , December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court held that the surety of a bond required by statute for a used car dealer license was not required to pay punitive damages, attorney fees, and costs in order to satisfy a judgment against its principal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
