 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mulcahy v. Mossa, CV0200774975S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a motorist's counterclaim against the State of Connecticut was not brought within two years, as required by the applicable statute, the claim was time-barred; the State's participation in the action was to seek reimbursement.
|
|||||
| Petrone v. Petrone, FA020730143S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce action, trial court denied both parties' motions for contempt and clarified which property went with marital home and that wife was to return to husband property he acquired before marriage or after dissolution.
|
|||||
| Santana v. Santana, FA010385110S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court granted divorce and other relief including home (subject to mortgage), joint child custody, $ 158 weekly child support to wife, liberal and reasonable visitation to husband, and division of other assets and debts.
|
|||||
| Scholastic, Inc. v. City of Danbury, CV030349100S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A city's motion to strike various allegations of a property owner's complaint challenging an assessment was denied where the grounds asserted were proper for a request to revise, but not proper for a motion to strike.
|
|||||
| Statewide Griev. Comm. v. Gillis, CV030479677S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court found no discipline violations for lawyer's allegedly making two car accident claims and settlement demands without disclosing other accidents and overstating doctor bills and injuries; there was no evidence of insurers' reliance.
|
|||||
| Stobierski v. Walnut Hill, Inc., CV030518847,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since a complete absence of a good faith certificate merely rendered a medical malpractice complaint subject to a motion to strike, the court denied the healthcare provider's motion to dismiss based on a flawed good faith certificate.
|
|||||
| Swinburne v. Swinburne, FA010122811S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 28, 2004, Decided , January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reduction in child support order was vacated where the husband failed to disclose overtime income to postjudgment court, which reduced the original award.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
