 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonanno v. Bolling, CV054006708S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Home owner's motion to discharge a mechanic's lien pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-35a(a) was granted, because the contract entered into between the owner and a contractor for home repairs did not satisfy the requirements of the Home Improvement Act, and those requirements were mandatory.
|
|||||
| Coleman v. E. Hampton Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency, CV044000452S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an agency did not give more than two days notice before it scheduled a hearing as required by Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-7(d) on a proposal that constituted a "significant activity," the agency was without jurisdiction to hold a hearing and its decision was void.
|
|||||
| Covello v. New Eng. Carting, Inc., FSTCV0402001121,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a contract dispute, because a party objecting to a fact finder's report did not avail itself of an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to Conn. Gen. Prac. Book, R. Super. Ct. § 23-58(a) and did not file a transcript of the trial before the fact finder, its objections to the fact finder's report had to be overruled.
|
|||||
| Diaz v. PARCC Health Care, CV054006901,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-599, court dismissed negligence claim against nursing home as patient had died before suit was filed and no executor or administrator had been appointed to represent deceased at time of commencement; but, if appointed, representative had 1 year from date of decision to file suit under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-592(a).
|
|||||
| Gurguis v. Frankel, 125565,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Christian M., H14CP0400800A, H14CP04008001A, H14CP04008002A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A daughter was found neglected under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-120(9)(B), (C), and (D); on at least two occasions she suffered severe injuries, including fractures to her ribs, her legs, and her arm, while her parents were primary care providers. Termination of the father's parental rights was appropriate under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-112(j)(3)(C).
|
|||||
| In re Timothy D., T11CP04011857A,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's parental rights were terminated after he failed to appear at trial. Reasonable efforts had been made to locate the father, the father had abandoned the child, he failed to achieve any degree of reasonable rehabilitation, and based on father's extensive criminal and substance abuse history, termination was in child's best interests.
|
|||||
| Kensington Acres N. Owners Ass'n v. Town of Madison, CV040490454S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding in favor of a condominium owner's association in its appeal based on Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-117a was proper where the assessment made by the town's board of assessment appeals was excessive based on the court's view of the property and comparable property.
|
|||||
| Lavigne v. Loulakis, CV030082717S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TOLLAND, AT ROCKVILLE, January 30, 2006, Decided , January 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
