LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Connecticut - December 16, 1999

  
Langlois-Clishman v. McNulty, CV 990155267, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Mother and minor daughter had independent right to seek recovery for same expenses in a negligence action, although only one of the two would actually be able to recover.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Moazed v. Moazed, FA 990173882S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Plaintiff's motion to reargue and/or clarify a prior order of the court was denied as presented, because motions to reargue and to clarify could not be combined in one motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rodriguez v. Warden State Prison, CV 970328324S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where petitioner failed to prove that assistance rendered by his trial and appellate counsel was inadequate and adversely affected the outcome of the proceedings, a petition for habeas corpus relief was denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rosenfield v. Rosenfield, FA 880097037S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sheffield v. Laundry, CV 2110172, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NORWICH, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tartell v. Tartell, FA 980167665, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Husband's request that his wife be ordered to pay fifty percent of the couple's child's private school tuition as part of their divorce was denied when husband failed to demonstrate wife's ability to pay.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tricoastal Lanthanides v. Chang, CV 950144760S, SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, December 16, 1999, Decided , December 16, 1999, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The court had subject matter jurisdiction through its inherent power to open judgment when fraudulently obtained, stipulated or otherwise, but until prior judgment opened, had no authority to order post-judgment discovery.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.