 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Balsamo v. Rossi, FA 990172814S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, April 11, 2000, Decided , April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Colvest Group v. Connecticut Commer. Land Corp., CV 9805801865S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, April 11, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff buyer breached land sale contract when it refused to perform upon the discovery of wetlands on the property; because wetlands were not deficiency, defendant seller was required to cure under agreement.
|
|||||
| Continental Capital Corp. v. Lazarte, (AC 19423),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court should not have refused to hear appellant's motion to open a default judgment against her on its merits because it did not allow her the full period of 20 days to appeal the judgment.
|
|||||
| Cosby v. Commissioner of Correction, (AC 19828),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of writ of habeas corpus affirmed; petitioner failed to show counsel's performance failed to comply with standards; the court acted properly, lawfully and in accordance with applicable law in dismissing petition.
|
|||||
| Coville v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., (AC 18425),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because plaintiff's boyfriend took physical custody of her by taking her to truck, lifting her inside, and forcing her to remain by closing door each time she opened it, jury should have been instructed on duty to protect.
|
|||||
| D'Addario v. Truskoski, (AC 17723),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owners were granted an easement by necessity over adjoining property owners' land as equity required that they access a right-of-way over the adjoining property owners' land for the beneficial enjoyment of their land.
|
|||||
| Doe v. Yale Univ., (SC 15955),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: University was entitled to present the special defense of exclusivity under the Workers' Compensation Act, despite its status as a joint venture organized not for profit, and retrial was ordered.
|
|||||
| Empire Paving, Inc. v. City of Milford, (AC 18233),
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Provisions of contract for sewer construction defeated plaintiff's breach of contract action, as contract terms stated a written protest to payment decisions be filed within 10 days of decision, which plaintiff failed to do.
|
|||||
| Gauger v. Frankl, (SC 16130),
SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT, April 11, 2000, Officially Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since plaintiffs' heart and hypertension benefits were to be paid in the same manner as workers' compensation benefits, the benefits were subject to the review and modification procedures set forth in that act.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
