 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonaffini v. Bridgeport Hosp., X01CV980150693S, X01CV9801506928,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered defendant hospital, or its attorney, to disclose to plaintiff patients the author of a document describing an infection outbreak at the hospital. The source of the document was not protected by the attorney-client privilege.
|
|||||
| Burzynski v. Stop & Shop, CV970403232S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff claimed she fell at store due to rice on floor, but she did not prove rice caused fall, rice observed by witness was involved in fall, or that fall took place where rice was spilled, judgment entered for defendant.
|
|||||
| Garofalo v. Boyer, CV980582789S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgage holder had not extended credit frequently enough to be considered creditor under truth in lending provisions. Where modification of mortgage did not change amount of mortgage or interest rate, there was no refinancing of debt.
|
|||||
| Hamden Chrysler-Plymouth v. Northeast Parking & Transp., CV000444192S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant parking lot's manner of storing cars in its care in a field that was inadequately lighted, not secure, and unguarded, with the keys left in the ignition, constituted negligence, violated CUTPA, and caused damage to plaintiff.
|
|||||
| Hester v. Hester, FA960151821S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK AT STAMFORD, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court had subject matter jurisdiction to determine a post decree motion to modify post-majority child support provisions, even in the absence of a written agreement modifying the same.
|
|||||
| Oberlander v. Sullivan, CV990174585S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Transportation commissioner's motion to dismiss crossing guard's highway defect action was denied. Notice alleging that guard fell on loose water pipe cap lying in roadway due to improperly maintained pavement was sufficient under statute.
|
|||||
| Stearns v. Stearns, FA980417654S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dissolution action, where court found husband committed physical abuse against wife and wife had several romantic relationships with men other than husband, court concluded both parties contributed to irretrievable breakdown of marriage.
|
|||||
| Wozniak v. New Britain Gen. Hosp., XO3CV950502560S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, COMPLEX LITIGATION SESSION, January 25, 2001, Decided , January 25, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court granted defendant psychotherapists' motion to bifurcate the issues of liability and damages, to save costs and reduce prejudice, after one of their patients allegedly intentionally drove into and severely injured an infant plaintiff.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
