 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alex M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, December 17, 1999, Decided , December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court ordered the termination of parental rights because the mother had failed to rehabilitate herself as a parent after the child had been adjudicated neglected and the father had abandoned the child.
|
|||||
| Cain v. Destefano, CV 980420347,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to strike the CORA allegation in count one of plaintiffs' complaint was denied because a RICO allegation was also made in that count but was not addressed by defendant's motion.
|
|||||
| Chain v. Town of Cheshire, CV 990430165S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Decided , December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff taxpayer had no standing to challenge defendant town's demolition order because he had no pecuniary or other tangible interest at stake, and because the order had been suspended.
|
|||||
| Luciano v. Warden, 540226,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, December 17, 1999, Decided , December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As prisoner's second attorney zealously attempted to establish defense and negotiate manslaughter plea, and his recommendation of a guilty plea was sound, there was no ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Monaghan v. Scalia, CV 990421148S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Decided , December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff not entitled to summary judgment in a negligence case where the defendant's claim as to sun blinding raised a material issue of fact as to defendant's negligence.
|
|||||
| P.A., Inc. v. Bascilica, CV 990424248,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Notwithstanding defendant insurer's notice of an assignment, plaintiff was not made loss payee on a negotiable draft; thus, sufficient facts of intentional and negligent conduct were alleged to withstand a motion to strike.
|
|||||
| Potter v. Town of Hamden, CV 980414081,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Co-defendants' cross-claim was dismissed because municipalities were immune from negligence actions and, therefore, had no primary liability upon which indemnity could be sought.
|
|||||
| Ramos v. Town of Branford, 407617,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, December 17, 1999, Decided , December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent firefighter's estate was barred by the exclusivity provision of the worker's compensation statute from bringing a tort action absent proof that defendant employers created a substantial certainty of harm.
|
|||||
| Sousa v. City of Hartford, CV 96564676,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, December 17, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Slip and fall plaintiff failed to show that city had actual or constructive notice of sidewalk defect and that she had exercised due care in travelling allegedly defective sidewalk so no liability existed under state statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
