 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baillargeon v. Warden, 538355, 538355,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although attorney representing petitioner for sentencing was deficient by not requesting a continuance for time to review files, petitioner did not suffer any actual prejudice and the proceeding would not have been different.
|
|||||
| Bugryn v. City of Bristol, CV 980488051S, CV 990495681S, CV 990495682S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' fears, apprehensions, and disruptions over losing their homes were not sufficient to constitute a showing of irreparable harm. Just compensation for their properties provided them with an adequate remedy.
|
|||||
| Canny v. Canny, FA 990430923,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted plaintiff wife's motion for child support and alimony pendente lite, and granted defendant husband's motion for an inventory of personal property, in the parties' dissolution of marriage action.
|
|||||
| Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, X02CV 970150435S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because action was commenced with wrong party in interest by honest mistake, and party substitution was necessary for determination of real matter in dispute, motion to substitute party plaintiff was properly granted.
|
|||||
| Facchini v. Miller, CV 990587686S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT HARTFORD, January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In stock sale of closely held corporation, plaintiff did not sufficiently allege breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, but did sufficiently allege aiding and abetting misrepresentation and deceptive business acts.
|
|||||
| Fournier v. Girardin, HCN 9907026BR, # 1190,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD - NEW BRITAIN, AT NEW BRITAIN, HOUSING SESSION, January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In landlord-tenant dispute in which plaintiff alleged numerous code violations against defendant landlord, action was dismissed, as virtually all code violations had been corrected.
|
|||||
| Hammond v. Town of Branford Zoning Bd. of Appeals, CV 990422752,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A zoning board's decision to grant variances to a landowner was proper where the landowner established sufficient legal hardship and the grant of the variances did not substantially affect the comprehensive zoning plan.
|
|||||
| Jones v. New Haven Register, Inc., Docket No. CV960393657S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff, a general purpose public figure when his photograph was mistakenly printed with an article about another, failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendant published his photograph with actual malice.
|
|||||
| King v. Warden/State Prison, CV 980333764S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY, AT DANBURY, January 31, 2000, Decided , January 31, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied because vacation of plea agreement was caused by petitioner's own actions in not appearing before sentencing court, rather than by ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
