 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Balnis v. Balnis, FA980720098S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Wife's motion to modify custody granted to a limited extent. Child support order entered pursuant to the guidelines.
|
|||||
| Boanno v. Papcin, CV980063191,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ANSONIA - MILFORD, AT DERBY, GEOGRAPHICAL AREA 5, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's physical attack on plaintiff was found to be committed intentionally and with reckless disregard for plaintiff's safety. Thus, the assault and battery was willful and wanton which warranted compensatory and punitive damages.
|
|||||
| Brossy v. Brossy, FA940365430S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, REGIONAL FAMILY TRIAL DOCKET AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Custody and residence of minor children were retained; husband's visitation scheduled was modified; two motions for contempt were granted.
|
|||||
| Dragone v. Duly, CV000377451S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF FAIRFIELD, AT BRIDGEPORT, January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court awarded plaintiff a prejudgment remedy equal to 50 percent of a note which plaintiff had paid in full. The defendant was a co-maker of the note and not an accommodation maker so had to reimburse plaintiff for his share.
|
|||||
| Henderson v. Warden, CV970404743S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Habeas corpus petition was dismissed because prisoner failed to establish that trial judge's canvass was substantially deficient, or that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because counsel did not raise that issue on appeal.
|
|||||
| Henrie v. East Haven Builders Supply, CV000438147S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff and defendant negotiated employment contract containing arbitration clause through several drafts, but defendant never signed contract, plaintiff was not entitled to arbitration after he was fired.
|
|||||
| In re Jessica M., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD, JUVENILE MATTERS, AT TORRINGTON, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Social services agency possessed the requisite aggrievement, and, therefore, standing to bring and prosecute appeal from the termination of the mother's parental rights to her three children. Motion to dismiss appeal was denied.
|
|||||
| Journal Publ. Co. v. Hartford Courant Co., CV000801424,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's application in equity for a bill of discovery was premature, where petitioner did not yet have facts, but merely allegations, to support its proposed cause of action for restraint of trade.
|
|||||
| Kupersmith v. Executive Risk Specialty Ins. Co., X01CV000160077S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY, AT WATERBURY, January 26, 2001, Decided , January 26, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiffs' claims all arose out of insurer's actions regarding claims arising from same loss that were all treated in same way, plaintiffs failed to state claim for violation of CUTPA based on unfair practices in insurance transaction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
