|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Connecticut - March 11, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
Belic v. Amtrak, CV010275697S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT MERIDEN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Individual's revised complaint against 2nd railroad was stricken; there was no private right of action in Connecticut to enforce statute regarding procedure for changing crossing signals or to enforce Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
|
|
| |
Cadle Co. v. Gabel, CV000091155,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIDDLESEX, AT MIDDLETOWN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In order for constructive trust to be imposed, plaintiff needed to show harm. However, alleged harm was not confined to property equity where debtor had been able to divest himself of assets, yet still retained all the benefits of ownership.
|
|
| |
Comm'r of Transp. v. Shea, File No. CV00-0598584S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD, AT HARTFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because the commission of transportation failed to adequately the amount of damages resulting from a taking in an eminent domain proceeding, the trial court adjusted the amount of compensation owed to property owners along side a highway.
|
|
| |
Debaise Constr. Co. v. Curello, CV990425839S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW HAVEN, AT NEW HAVEN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because building was functional and owner did not show cause of defects, available remedies, or remediation costs, builder had substantially performed contract and was entitled to foreclose its lien.
|
|
| |
Engelmann v. Dominion Nuclear Conn., X04CV010124475S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET AT NEW LONDON, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Failure to exhaust administrative remedies was jurisdictional defect. Claims asking to prohibit operations and conversion at nuclear power plant were dismissed, as plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
|
|
| |
Findell v. Koos, CV010510859S,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN AT NEW BRITAIN, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trust did not allege contractual relationship, personal receipt of trust property, uncompensated services, or demonstrate requisite control to pierce corporate veil; it did sufficiently allege conspiracy.
|
|
| |
Fletcher v. Stoleson, X05CV000177740S, X05CV980165956S, X05CV990173423S,,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: No rational jury could disbelieve the unchallenged and overwhelming evidence that there was no agency relationship between the owners and the driver at the time of the accident. Thus, the statutory presumption did not survive.
|
|
| |
Gourdet v. Gourdet, FA990172034,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD-NORWALK, AT STAMFORD, March 11, 2002, Decided , March 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage case, where the wife testified that the husband was a loving father and that the children loved him in return, it was in the children's best interests that they maintain a relationship with him.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback